Newcastle Would Have Sold Isak—If Ekitike or Sesko Had Signed

 

'image.png' failed to upload. TransportError: Error code = 7, Path = /_/BloggerUi/data/batchexecute, Message = There was an error during the transport or processing of this request., Unknown HTTP error in underlying XHR (HTTP Status: 0) (XHR Error Code: 6) (XHR Error Message: ' [0]')

Newcastle United were prepared to sell Alexander Isak to Liverpool—if they had secured a replacement.

According to Sky Sports News’ Keith Downie, the Magpies would have “reluctantly” sanctioned Isak’s exit had they landed either Hugo Ekitike or Benjamin Sesko earlier in the window. Both strikers were on Newcastle’s shortlist, but Ekitike joined Liverpool and Sesko signed for Manchester United, leaving the Tyneside club without a viable alternative.

Isak’s bombshell statement on social media—claiming “the relationship can’t continue” due to broken promises—sparked speculation of an imminent move. Liverpool were ready to increase their bid, but Newcastle’s inability to sign a new striker forced them to shut the door.

“Newcastle have tried hard to facilitate and give Isak his wish,” Downie reported. “But they cannot leave themselves without a recognized striker.”

Unless a surprise deal materializes before the September 1 deadline, Isak is expected to stay—though whether he plays again remains uncertain.

🔍 Key Takeaways:

  • Newcastle would have sold Isak if Ekitike or Sesko had signed

  • Liverpool’s bid fell short of Newcastle’s valuation

  • Isak’s public statement added pressure, but no replacement means no sale

  • The striker’s future role under Eddie Howe is now unclear

With deadline day approaching, the saga may not be over—but Newcastle’s stance is firm.

Comments